Coding · Benchmark profile
An independently evaluated LiveCodeBench result from Artificial Analysis.
Data verified 21 Jul 2026 · Methodology 1.6.0
Benchmark score on Artificial Analysis LiveCodeBench
Gemini 3 Pro leads at 91.7%, followed by GLM-4.7 (89.4%) and GPT-OSS 120B (87.8%).
Visual analysis
Switch between model placement, score distribution and descriptive provider averages. Every view uses the same sourced leaderboard.
3 ranked models · higher is better
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3 Pro | #1 | 91.7% | |
| GLM-4.7 | #2 | Z.AI | 89.4% |
| GPT-OSS 120B | #3 | OpenAI | 87.8% |
One best score per model · higher is better
| Rank | Model | Provider | License | Evidence use | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Gemini 3 Pro gemini-3-pro | closed | Reference only | 91.7% | |
| #2 | GLM-4.7 glm-4.7 | Z.AI | open | Reference only | 89.4% |
| #3 | GPT-OSS 120B gpt-oss-120b | OpenAI | open | Reference only | 87.8% |
The top of this snapshot is led by Gemini 3 Pro at 91.7%; third place is 3.9 points behind. The top-3 spread is 3.9 points.
About Artificial Analysis LiveCodeBench
An independently evaluated LiveCodeBench result from Artificial Analysis. Results stay tied to the exact model variant and evaluation system. Multiple systems for the same model use the best published score on this page; overall Lumina scoring uses the median of ranking-eligible rows.
Open benchmark source ↗FAQ
An independently evaluated LiveCodeBench result from Artificial Analysis.
Gemini 3 Pro by Google currently leads with 91.7%.
3 models in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.
No. This benchmark is display-only and does not enter the overall Lumina composite.
Related
