FrontierScience leaderboard
1 ranked models · higher is better
View accessible chart data
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.4 Pro | #1 | OpenAI | 36.7% |
Knowledge · Benchmark profile
A benchmark for research-level scientific reasoning, designed to separate frontier models on difficult science tasks that mix domain knowledge with deep reasoning.
Data verified 21 Jul 2026 · Methodology 1.6.0
Visual analysis
Switch between model placement, score distribution and descriptive provider averages. Every view uses the same sourced leaderboard.
1 ranked models · higher is better
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.4 Pro | #1 | OpenAI | 36.7% |
One best score per model · higher is better
| Rank | Model | Provider | License | Evidence use | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | GPT-5.4 Pro gpt-5-4-pro | OpenAI | closed | Estimated reference | 36.7% |
About FrontierScience
A benchmark for research-level scientific reasoning, designed to separate frontier models on difficult science tasks that mix domain knowledge with deep reasoning. Results stay tied to the exact model variant and evaluation system. Multiple systems for the same model use the best published score on this page; overall Lumina scoring uses the median of ranking-eligible rows.
Open benchmark source ↗FAQ
A benchmark for research-level scientific reasoning, designed to separate frontier models on difficult science tasks that mix domain knowledge with deep reasoning.
GPT-5.4 Pro by OpenAI currently leads with 36.7%.
1 model in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.
Related
2026 · 10 results · Reference
Artificial Analysis MMLU-Pro2026 · 4 results · Reference
Massive Multitask Language Understanding2020 · 8 results · Reference
Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A2023 · 70 results · Reference
SuperGPQA: Scaling LLM Evaluation Across 285 Graduate Disciplines2025 · 19 results · Reference
Massive Multitask Language Understanding Professional2024 · 42 results · Reference