MM-ClawBench leaderboard
2 ranked models · higher is better
View accessible chart data
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax M2.7 | #1 | MiniMax | 62.7% |
| MiMo-V2.5 | #2 | Xiaomi | 23.8% |
Loading benchmark header
Loading benchmark registry
Agents · Benchmark profile
An OpenClaw-derived agent benchmark covering practical work and life tasks such as office document delivery, research, planning, and code maintenance.
Data verified 21 Jul 2026 · Methodology 1.6.0
Benchmark score on MM-ClawBench
MiniMax M2.7 leads at 62.7%, followed by MiMo-V2.5 (23.8%).
Visual analysis
Switch between model placement, score distribution and descriptive provider averages. Every view uses the same sourced leaderboard.
2 ranked models · higher is better
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax M2.7 | #1 | MiniMax | 62.7% |
| MiMo-V2.5 | #2 | Xiaomi | 23.8% |
One best score per model · higher is better
| Rank | Model | Provider | License | Evidence use | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2-7 | MiniMax | open | Reference only | 62.7% |
| #2 | MiMo-V2.5 mimo-v2.5 | Xiaomi | open | Estimated reference | 23.8% |
About MM-ClawBench
An OpenClaw-derived agent benchmark covering practical work and life tasks such as office document delivery, research, planning, and code maintenance. Results stay tied to the exact model variant and evaluation system. Multiple systems for the same model use the best published score on this page; overall Lumina scoring uses the median of ranking-eligible rows.
Open benchmark source ↗FAQ
An OpenClaw-derived agent benchmark covering practical work and life tasks such as office document delivery, research, planning, and code maintenance.
MiniMax M2.7 by MiniMax currently leads with 62.7%.
2 models in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.
No. This benchmark is display-only and does not enter the overall Lumina composite.
Related