Spider 2.0-Lite leaderboard
1 ranked models · higher is better
View accessible chart data
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interfaze Beta | #1 | Interfaze | 52.9% |
Loading benchmark header
Loading benchmark registry
Coding · Benchmark profile
A text-to-SQL benchmark over realistic warehouse-scale schemas, reported by Interfaze for model comparison.
Data verified 21 Jul 2026 · Methodology 1.6.0
Visual analysis
Switch between model placement, score distribution and descriptive provider averages. Every view uses the same sourced leaderboard.
1 ranked models · higher is better
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interfaze Beta | #1 | Interfaze | 52.9% |
One best score per model · higher is better
| Rank | Model | Provider | License | Evidence use | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Interfaze Beta interfaze-beta | Interfaze | closed | Estimated reference | 52.9% |
About Spider 2.0-Lite
A text-to-SQL benchmark over realistic warehouse-scale schemas, reported by Interfaze for model comparison. Results stay tied to the exact model variant and evaluation system. Multiple systems for the same model use the best published score on this page; overall Lumina scoring uses the median of ranking-eligible rows.
Open benchmark source ↗FAQ
A text-to-SQL benchmark over realistic warehouse-scale schemas, reported by Interfaze for model comparison.
Interfaze Beta by Interfaze currently leads with 52.9%.
1 model in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.
Related