SVG-Bench leaderboard
1 ranked models · higher is better
View accessible chart data
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax M3 | #1 | MiniMax | 63.7% |
Loading benchmark header
Loading benchmark registry
Coding · Benchmark profile
A display-only provider benchmark for generating or manipulating SVG outputs from natural-language requirements.
Data verified 21 Jul 2026 · Methodology 1.6.0
Visual analysis
Switch between model placement, score distribution and descriptive provider averages. Every view uses the same sourced leaderboard.
1 ranked models · higher is better
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax M3 | #1 | MiniMax | 63.7% |
One best score per model · higher is better
| Rank | Model | Provider | License | Evidence use | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | MiniMax M3 MiniMax-M3 | MiniMax | — | Reference only | 63.7% |
About SVG-Bench
A display-only provider benchmark for generating or manipulating SVG outputs from natural-language requirements. Results stay tied to the exact model variant and evaluation system. Multiple systems for the same model use the best published score on this page; overall Lumina scoring uses the median of ranking-eligible rows.
Open benchmark source ↗FAQ
A display-only provider benchmark for generating or manipulating SVG outputs from natural-language requirements.
MiniMax M3 by MiniMax currently leads with 63.7%.
1 model in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.
No. This benchmark is display-only and does not enter the overall Lumina composite.
Related