Leaderboard bars
1 ranked models · higher is better
View accessible chart data
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Plus | #1 | Alibaba Cloud | 86% |
Loading benchmark header
Loading benchmark registry
Multimodal · Benchmark profile
A multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert-level tasks.
Data verified 15 July 2026 · Methodology 1.2.0
Visual analysis
Three views of the same sourced leaderboard: model placement, the score curve, and descriptive provider averages. These visuals never alter ranking calculations.
1 ranked models · higher is better
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Plus | #1 | Alibaba Cloud | 86% |
Shows how quickly scores separate down the field
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 Plus | #1 | Alibaba Cloud | 86% |
Average within the visible cohort · descriptive only
| Provider | Models | Average score |
|---|---|---|
| Alibaba Cloud | 1 | 86% |
One best score per model · higher is better
| Rank | Model | Provider | License | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Qwen3.6 Plus qwen3-6-plus | Alibaba Cloud | closed | 86% |
About MMMU
A multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert-level tasks. Results stay tied to the exact model variant and evaluation system. Multiple systems for the same model use the best published score on this page; overall Lumina scoring uses the median of ranking-eligible rows.
Open benchmark source ↗FAQ
A multi-discipline multimodal understanding and reasoning benchmark for expert-level tasks.
Qwen3.6 Plus by Alibaba Cloud currently leads with 86%.
1 model in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.
No. This benchmark is display-only and does not enter the overall Lumina composite.
Related