BabyVision leaderboard
1 ranked models · higher is better
View accessible chart data
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.1 | #1 | Meta | 76.3% |
Multimodal · Benchmark profile
A multimodal benchmark for fine-grained visual perception and grounded reasoning tasks.
Data verified 21 Jul 2026 · Methodology 1.6.0
Visual analysis
Switch between model placement, score distribution and descriptive provider averages. Every view uses the same sourced leaderboard.
1 ranked models · higher is better
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.1 | #1 | Meta | 76.3% |
One best score per model · higher is better
| Rank | Model | Provider | License | Evidence use | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Muse Spark 1.1 muse-spark-1-1 | Meta | closed | Reference only | 76.3% |
About BabyVision
A multimodal benchmark for fine-grained visual perception and grounded reasoning tasks. Results stay tied to the exact model variant and evaluation system. Multiple systems for the same model use the best published score on this page; overall Lumina scoring uses the median of ranking-eligible rows.
Open benchmark source ↗FAQ
A multimodal benchmark for fine-grained visual perception and grounded reasoning tasks.
Muse Spark 1.1 by Meta currently leads with 76.3%.
1 model in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.
No. This benchmark is display-only and does not enter the overall Lumina composite.
Related