DynaMath leaderboard
1 ranked models · higher is better
View accessible chart data
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 27B | #1 | Alibaba Cloud | 85.6% |
Loading benchmark header
Loading benchmark registry
Multimodal · Benchmark profile
A multimodal benchmark for dynamic mathematical reasoning over visual and structured inputs.
Data verified 21 Jul 2026 · Methodology 1.6.0
Visual analysis
Switch between model placement, score distribution and descriptive provider averages. Every view uses the same sourced leaderboard.
1 ranked models · higher is better
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 27B | #1 | Alibaba Cloud | 85.6% |
One best score per model · higher is better
| Rank | Model | Provider | License | Evidence use | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Qwen3.6 27B qwen3.6-27b | Alibaba Cloud | open | Estimated reference | 85.6% |
About DynaMath
A multimodal benchmark for dynamic mathematical reasoning over visual and structured inputs. Results stay tied to the exact model variant and evaluation system. Multiple systems for the same model use the best published score on this page; overall Lumina scoring uses the median of ranking-eligible rows.
Open benchmark source ↗FAQ
A multimodal benchmark for dynamic mathematical reasoning over visual and structured inputs.
Qwen3.6 27B by Alibaba Cloud currently leads with 85.6%.
1 model in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.
No. This benchmark is display-only and does not enter the overall Lumina composite.
Related