MMSearch-Plus leaderboard
1 ranked models · higher is better
View accessible chart data
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7-Plus | #1 | Alibaba Cloud | 41.4% |
Loading benchmark header
Loading benchmark registry
Multimodal · Benchmark profile
A harder MMSearch variant for multimodal retrieval and grounded tool-use workflows.
Data verified 21 Jul 2026 · Methodology 1.6.0
Visual analysis
Switch between model placement, score distribution and descriptive provider averages. Every view uses the same sourced leaderboard.
1 ranked models · higher is better
| Model | Rank | Provider | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7-Plus | #1 | Alibaba Cloud | 41.4% |
One best score per model · higher is better
| Rank | Model | Provider | License | Evidence use | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Qwen3.7-Plus qwen3.7-plus | Alibaba Cloud | — | Reference only | 41.4% |
About MMSearch-Plus
A harder MMSearch variant for multimodal retrieval and grounded tool-use workflows. Results stay tied to the exact model variant and evaluation system. Multiple systems for the same model use the best published score on this page; overall Lumina scoring uses the median of ranking-eligible rows.
Open benchmark source ↗FAQ
A harder MMSearch variant for multimodal retrieval and grounded tool-use workflows.
Qwen3.7-Plus by Alibaba Cloud currently leads with 41.4%.
1 model in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.
No. This benchmark is display-only and does not enter the overall Lumina composite.
Related