Agents · Benchmark profile

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Stateful multi-step enterprise workflow agent benchmark graded on final database state across business domains.

Ranking weightedCurrent / rollingActive26 models

Data verified 15 July 2026 · Methodology 1.2.0

Benchmark score on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Leaderboard · 26 models

Claude Fable 5 leads at 51.1%, followed by Gemini 3.5 Flash (50.1%) and GPT-5.5 (46.6%).

Ranking · 0.9%AgentsCurrent

#1Closed

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic

claude-fable-5

51.1%

Overall #2 · Context 1M tokens

#2Closed

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Google

gemini-3.5-flash

50.1%

Overall #17 · Context 1.05M tokens

#3Closed

GPT-5.5

OpenAI

gpt-5.5

46.6%

Overall #8 · Context 1.05M tokens

Visual analysis

See the field, not just the table.

Three views of the same sourced leaderboard: model placement, the score curve, and descriptive provider averages. These visuals never alter ranking calculations.

ModelsColours

AnthropicGoogleOpenAIMoonshot AIAlibaba CloudZ.AIxAIDeepSeekXiaomiMistral AIMiniMax

Leaderboard bars

20 ranked models · higher is better

View accessible chart data

Accessible data for Leaderboard bars
Model	Rank	Provider	Score
Claude Fable 5	#1	Anthropic	51.1%
Gemini 3.5 Flash	#2	Google	50.1%
GPT-5.5	#3	OpenAI	46.6%
Kimi K3	#4	Moonshot AI	45.3%
Qwen3.7-Max	#5	Alibaba Cloud	45.0%
Claude Sonnet 5	#6	Anthropic	44.7%
Claude Opus 4.8	#7	Anthropic	44.0%
GLM-5.2	#8	Z.AI	42.7%
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	#9	Google	42.2%
Grok 4.5	#10	xAI	40.8%
Qwen3.7-Plus	#11	Alibaba Cloud	40.6%
DeepSeek V4 Pro	#12	DeepSeek	40.4%
MiMo-V2-Flash	#13	Xiaomi	40.4%
Kimi K2.7 Code	#14	Moonshot AI	40.2%
DeepSeek V4 Flash	#15	DeepSeek	39.6%
Kimi K2.6	#16	Moonshot AI	38.5%
GPT-5.4 mini	#17	OpenAI	34.6%
Mistral Medium 3.5	#18	Mistral AI	33.7%
MiniMax M3	#19	MiniMax	32.1%
GPT-5.4 nano	#20	OpenAI	31.5%

Score curve

Shows how quickly scores separate down the field

View accessible chart data

Accessible data for Score curve
Model	Rank	Provider	Score
Claude Fable 5	#1	Anthropic	51.1%
Gemini 3.5 Flash	#2	Google	50.1%
GPT-5.5	#3	OpenAI	46.6%
Kimi K3	#4	Moonshot AI	45.3%
Qwen3.7-Max	#5	Alibaba Cloud	45.0%
Claude Sonnet 5	#6	Anthropic	44.7%
Claude Opus 4.8	#7	Anthropic	44.0%
GLM-5.2	#8	Z.AI	42.7%
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	#9	Google	42.2%
Grok 4.5	#10	xAI	40.8%
Qwen3.7-Plus	#11	Alibaba Cloud	40.6%
DeepSeek V4 Pro	#12	DeepSeek	40.4%
MiMo-V2-Flash	#13	Xiaomi	40.4%
Kimi K2.7 Code	#14	Moonshot AI	40.2%
DeepSeek V4 Flash	#15	DeepSeek	39.6%
Kimi K2.6	#16	Moonshot AI	38.5%
GPT-5.4 mini	#17	OpenAI	34.6%
Mistral Medium 3.5	#18	Mistral AI	33.7%
MiniMax M3	#19	MiniMax	32.1%
GPT-5.4 nano	#20	OpenAI	31.5%

Provider profile

Average within the visible cohort · descriptive only

View accessible chart data

Accessible data for Provider profile
Provider	Models	Average score
Anthropic	3	46.6%
Google	2	46.1%
Alibaba Cloud	2	42.8%
Z.AI	1	42.7%
Moonshot AI	3	41.4%
xAI	1	40.8%
Xiaomi	1	40.4%
DeepSeek	2	40.0%
OpenAI	3	37.6%
Mistral AI	1	33.7%
MiniMax	1	32.1%

Benchmark score table (26 models)

One best score per model · higher is better

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA leaderboard ranked by score
Rank	Model	Provider	License	Score
#1	Claude Fable 5 claude-fable-5	Anthropic	closed	51.1%
#2	Gemini 3.5 Flash gemini-3.5-flash	Google	closed	50.1%
#3	GPT-5.5 gpt-5.5	OpenAI	closed	46.6%
#4	Kimi K3 kimi-k3	Moonshot AI	closed	45.3%
#5	Qwen3.7-Max qwen3.7-max	Alibaba Cloud	—	45.0%
#6	Claude Sonnet 5 claude-sonnet-5	Anthropic	closed	44.7%
#7	Claude Opus 4.8 claude-opus-4-8	Anthropic	closed	44.0%
#8	GLM-5.2 glm-5-2	Z.AI	open	42.7%
#9	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview gemini-3.1-pro-preview	Google	closed	42.2%
#10	Grok 4.5 grok-4.5	xAI	closed	40.8%
#11	Qwen3.7-Plus qwen3.7-plus	Alibaba Cloud	—	40.6%
#12	DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-v4-pro	DeepSeek	open	40.4%
#13	MiMo-V2-Flash mimo-v2-flash	Xiaomi	open	40.4%
#14	Kimi K2.7 Code kimi-k2.7-code	Moonshot AI	open	40.2%
#15	DeepSeek V4 Flash deepseek-v4-flash	DeepSeek	open	39.6%
#16	Kimi K2.6 kimi-k2.6	Moonshot AI	open	38.5%
#17	GPT-5.4 mini gpt-5.4-mini	OpenAI	closed	34.6%
#18	Mistral Medium 3.5 mistral-medium-3-5	Mistral AI	open	33.7%
#19	MiniMax M3 MiniMax-M3	MiniMax	—	32.1%
#20	GPT-5.4 nano gpt.5.4.nano	OpenAI	closed	31.5%
#21	Qwen3.5 397B qwen3.5-397b-a17b	Alibaba Cloud	open	30.9%
#22	Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001	Anthropic	closed	29.4%
#23	Nemotron 3 Ultra nemotron-3-ultra-550b	NVIDIA	open	28.9%
#24	Gemma 4 31B gemma-4-31b	Google	open	28.3%
#25	Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite gemini-3.1-flash-lite	Google	closed	28.0%
#26	Grok 4.3 grok-4.3	xAI	closed	26.3%

The top of this snapshot is led by Claude Fable 5 at 51.1%; third place is 4.5 points behind. The top-10 spread is 10.3 points.

Compare top models

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 vs Kimi K3 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7-Max

About EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Definition and scoring

Organisation: Artificial Analysis / ServiceNow
Category: Agents
Version: Not evaluated
Direction: higher is better
Ranking use: Weighted 0.9%
Contamination risk: Unknown

Stateful multi-step enterprise workflow agent benchmark graded on final database state across business domains. Results stay tied to the exact model variant and evaluation system. Multiple systems for the same model use the best published score on this page; overall Lumina scoring uses the median of ranking-eligible rows.

Open benchmark source ↗

FAQ

Quick answers

What does EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA measure?

Stateful multi-step enterprise workflow agent benchmark graded on final database state across business domains.

Which model scores highest on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA?

Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic currently leads with 51.1%.

How many models are evaluated on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA?

26 models in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.

Does this affect overall Lumina rank?

Yes. This family is ranking-weighted at 0.9% of its capability category. Claude Fable 5 is overall #2.

Terminal-Bench

2.1 · 80 results · Weighted 1.6%

Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard

V3 · 2 results · Not Weighted

τ-bench

Rolling · 37 results · Weighted 1.6%

GAIA

Rolling · 13 results · Weighted 1.6%

BrowseComp

Rolling · 24 results · Weighted 1.6%

OSWorld

Rolling · 11 results · Weighted 1.6%

Agents · Benchmark profile

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Stateful multi-step enterprise workflow agent benchmark graded on final database state across business domains.

Ranking weightedCurrent / rollingActive26 models

Data verified 15 July 2026 · Methodology 1.2.0

Benchmark score on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Leaderboard · 26 models

Claude Fable 5 leads at 51.1%, followed by Gemini 3.5 Flash (50.1%) and GPT-5.5 (46.6%).

Ranking · 0.9%AgentsCurrent

#1Closed

Claude Fable 5

Anthropic

claude-fable-5

51.1%

Overall #2 · Context 1M tokens

#2Closed

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Google

gemini-3.5-flash

50.1%

Overall #17 · Context 1.05M tokens

#3Closed

GPT-5.5

OpenAI

gpt-5.5

46.6%

Overall #8 · Context 1.05M tokens

Visual analysis

See the field, not just the table.

Three views of the same sourced leaderboard: model placement, the score curve, and descriptive provider averages. These visuals never alter ranking calculations.

ModelsColours

AnthropicGoogleOpenAIMoonshot AIAlibaba CloudZ.AIxAIDeepSeekXiaomiMistral AIMiniMax

Leaderboard bars

20 ranked models · higher is better

View accessible chart data

Accessible data for Leaderboard bars
Model	Rank	Provider	Score
Claude Fable 5	#1	Anthropic	51.1%
Gemini 3.5 Flash	#2	Google	50.1%
GPT-5.5	#3	OpenAI	46.6%
Kimi K3	#4	Moonshot AI	45.3%
Qwen3.7-Max	#5	Alibaba Cloud	45.0%
Claude Sonnet 5	#6	Anthropic	44.7%
Claude Opus 4.8	#7	Anthropic	44.0%
GLM-5.2	#8	Z.AI	42.7%
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	#9	Google	42.2%
Grok 4.5	#10	xAI	40.8%
Qwen3.7-Plus	#11	Alibaba Cloud	40.6%
DeepSeek V4 Pro	#12	DeepSeek	40.4%
MiMo-V2-Flash	#13	Xiaomi	40.4%
Kimi K2.7 Code	#14	Moonshot AI	40.2%
DeepSeek V4 Flash	#15	DeepSeek	39.6%
Kimi K2.6	#16	Moonshot AI	38.5%
GPT-5.4 mini	#17	OpenAI	34.6%
Mistral Medium 3.5	#18	Mistral AI	33.7%
MiniMax M3	#19	MiniMax	32.1%
GPT-5.4 nano	#20	OpenAI	31.5%

Score curve

Shows how quickly scores separate down the field

View accessible chart data

Accessible data for Score curve
Model	Rank	Provider	Score
Claude Fable 5	#1	Anthropic	51.1%
Gemini 3.5 Flash	#2	Google	50.1%
GPT-5.5	#3	OpenAI	46.6%
Kimi K3	#4	Moonshot AI	45.3%
Qwen3.7-Max	#5	Alibaba Cloud	45.0%
Claude Sonnet 5	#6	Anthropic	44.7%
Claude Opus 4.8	#7	Anthropic	44.0%
GLM-5.2	#8	Z.AI	42.7%
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview	#9	Google	42.2%
Grok 4.5	#10	xAI	40.8%
Qwen3.7-Plus	#11	Alibaba Cloud	40.6%
DeepSeek V4 Pro	#12	DeepSeek	40.4%
MiMo-V2-Flash	#13	Xiaomi	40.4%
Kimi K2.7 Code	#14	Moonshot AI	40.2%
DeepSeek V4 Flash	#15	DeepSeek	39.6%
Kimi K2.6	#16	Moonshot AI	38.5%
GPT-5.4 mini	#17	OpenAI	34.6%
Mistral Medium 3.5	#18	Mistral AI	33.7%
MiniMax M3	#19	MiniMax	32.1%
GPT-5.4 nano	#20	OpenAI	31.5%

Provider profile

Average within the visible cohort · descriptive only

View accessible chart data

Accessible data for Provider profile
Provider	Models	Average score
Anthropic	3	46.6%
Google	2	46.1%
Alibaba Cloud	2	42.8%
Z.AI	1	42.7%
Moonshot AI	3	41.4%
xAI	1	40.8%
Xiaomi	1	40.4%
DeepSeek	2	40.0%
OpenAI	3	37.6%
Mistral AI	1	33.7%
MiniMax	1	32.1%

Benchmark score table (26 models)

One best score per model · higher is better

EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA leaderboard ranked by score
Rank	Model	Provider	License	Score
#1	Claude Fable 5 claude-fable-5	Anthropic	closed	51.1%
#2	Gemini 3.5 Flash gemini-3.5-flash	Google	closed	50.1%
#3	GPT-5.5 gpt-5.5	OpenAI	closed	46.6%
#4	Kimi K3 kimi-k3	Moonshot AI	closed	45.3%
#5	Qwen3.7-Max qwen3.7-max	Alibaba Cloud	—	45.0%
#6	Claude Sonnet 5 claude-sonnet-5	Anthropic	closed	44.7%
#7	Claude Opus 4.8 claude-opus-4-8	Anthropic	closed	44.0%
#8	GLM-5.2 glm-5-2	Z.AI	open	42.7%
#9	Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview gemini-3.1-pro-preview	Google	closed	42.2%
#10	Grok 4.5 grok-4.5	xAI	closed	40.8%
#11	Qwen3.7-Plus qwen3.7-plus	Alibaba Cloud	—	40.6%
#12	DeepSeek V4 Pro deepseek-v4-pro	DeepSeek	open	40.4%
#13	MiMo-V2-Flash mimo-v2-flash	Xiaomi	open	40.4%
#14	Kimi K2.7 Code kimi-k2.7-code	Moonshot AI	open	40.2%
#15	DeepSeek V4 Flash deepseek-v4-flash	DeepSeek	open	39.6%
#16	Kimi K2.6 kimi-k2.6	Moonshot AI	open	38.5%
#17	GPT-5.4 mini gpt-5.4-mini	OpenAI	closed	34.6%
#18	Mistral Medium 3.5 mistral-medium-3-5	Mistral AI	open	33.7%
#19	MiniMax M3 MiniMax-M3	MiniMax	—	32.1%
#20	GPT-5.4 nano gpt.5.4.nano	OpenAI	closed	31.5%
#21	Qwen3.5 397B qwen3.5-397b-a17b	Alibaba Cloud	open	30.9%
#22	Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001	Anthropic	closed	29.4%
#23	Nemotron 3 Ultra nemotron-3-ultra-550b	NVIDIA	open	28.9%
#24	Gemma 4 31B gemma-4-31b	Google	open	28.3%
#25	Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite gemini-3.1-flash-lite	Google	closed	28.0%
#26	Grok 4.3 grok-4.3	xAI	closed	26.3%

The top of this snapshot is led by Claude Fable 5 at 51.1%; third place is 4.5 points behind. The top-10 spread is 10.3 points.

Compare top models

Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 vs Kimi K3 Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.7-Max

About EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA

Definition and scoring

Organisation: Artificial Analysis / ServiceNow
Category: Agents
Version: Not evaluated
Direction: higher is better
Ranking use: Weighted 0.9%
Contamination risk: Unknown

Open benchmark source ↗

FAQ

Quick answers

What does EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA measure?

Stateful multi-step enterprise workflow agent benchmark graded on final database state across business domains.

Which model scores highest on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA?

Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic currently leads with 51.1%.

How many models are evaluated on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA?

26 models in the LuminaBench cohort have a qualifying score on this benchmark.

Does this affect overall Lumina rank?

Yes. This family is ranking-weighted at 0.9% of its capability category. Claude Fable 5 is overall #2.

Terminal-Bench

2.1 · 80 results · Weighted 1.6%

Berkeley Function-Calling Leaderboard

V3 · 2 results · Not Weighted

τ-bench

Rolling · 37 results · Weighted 1.6%

GAIA

Rolling · 13 results · Weighted 1.6%

BrowseComp

Rolling · 24 results · Weighted 1.6%

OSWorld

Rolling · 11 results · Weighted 1.6%

Leaderboard · 26 models

Claude Fable 5

Gemini 3.5 Flash

GPT-5.5

See the field, not just the table.

Benchmark score table (26 models)

Compare top models

Definition and scoring

Quick answers

What does EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA measure?

Which model scores highest on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA?

How many models are evaluated on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA?

Does this affect overall Lumina rank?

More Agents benchmarks

Leaderboard · 26 models

Claude Fable 5

Gemini 3.5 Flash

GPT-5.5

See the field, not just the table.

Benchmark score table (26 models)

Compare top models

Definition and scoring

Quick answers

What does EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA measure?

Which model scores highest on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA?

How many models are evaluated on EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA?

Does this affect overall Lumina rank?

More Agents benchmarks